Monday, July 31, 2017

Dunkirk left me a little shell-shocked which is to say that it's an incredible film.

What to say about Dunkirk?

I really knew nothing about this part of history going into the movie. I decided to go and watch it in IMAX, because Christopher Nolan never half-asses anything and I knew that if this film was going to be released in IMAX, that it would be filmed for that particular screen in the highest definition film possible. That's just how Christopher Nolan does things. The effect was visceral, explosive, thrilling, and got me so emotionally invested in this film that I want to see it again.

And this it a movie?...was so different from anything else I have ever seen that it felt more like an experience to me. You know how you can go to Harry Potter world and get your own Harry Potter experience with magic wands that light things up? You know how you can go to Disney World now and visit Pandora? It felt a lot like that.

There are no main characters in Dunkirk. I actually don't recall anything except for one boy's name who was in a lot of the scenes, but he certainly didn't have any more dialogue than anyone else. I know Kenneth Branagh was there looking amazing in his English navy uniform. Harry Styles was there too (playing a French soldier) along with Cilian Murphy and Tom Hardy (Christopher Nolan regulars). The really weird thing is, I felt like I was there too. About the only thing that breaks the notion of me being there is the presence of the music...a masterful soundtrack by composer Hans Zimmer. I realize that in real life, there's no soundtrack following me around adding tension or romance to scenes, but if that kind of thing did exist it wouldn't be a bad choice to go with Hans Zimmer. The man knows how to score a scene (even the really long ones).

I think Dunkirk is visual poetry. It's taking an event and presenting it with all of its chaos and inter-moving parts and characters, somehow throwing it all into a mixing bowl, and then laying it out again yet somehow it all works. Despite not knowing any of the characters backstory or their names, I found that I cared what happened to them. Nolan made me believe that the ships that kept getting sunk by the German planes were so real that I felt a little shell shock. As brave soldiers died by getting trapped in sinking hulls, I felt the same tension in my lungs (and the longing for a breath of air) if just for a moment. Somehow...Nolan was able to connect with me (and others in the theater) to form a strange empathy with all of us to the point that I don't think there was a single person present that had any other thoughts except the story.

Dunkirk (at least for me) captured 100% of my attention.

If you haven't seen it, you really should go. Pay for an IMAX ticket. It's worth the price.


  1. This film does seem really good, however, I know the story of Dunkirk and I'm afraid that if I do go and see this, I'll get so invested in it, become so moved and walk out an emotional wreck - as I'm sure so will a lot of others, too. And Hans Zimmer just adds to that. His scores are so epic, and because scores help enhance the mood, you know you're in for an emotional rollercoaster when he's

  2. And I couldn't agree more! Saw it last week as well and my review this coming Wednesday is similar to yours. There were no heroes. It did feel like you were there with them, living it rather than watching it. And I likened it to a piece of art rather than a movie.

  3. I loved it, but was disappointed they didn't make more of a show of the seven hundred boats that came to the rescue.

  4. I'm a history nerd and really loved the movie. My only issue was his insistence of practical effects which meant the beaches 'only' had a couple thousand on screen when it should have had tens of thousands. It would have been easy to digitally duplicate in extras but you have to give Nolan props for sticking to his vision.

    I agree that Zimmer's music was perfect. It mimicked a Stuka dive bomber the way it built tension. The picture as a whole feels like a passion project that is only possible for a director who has made boatloads of money for a studio and Nolan executed it masterfully.

  5. BTW, if you haven't already watch Atonement or read the novel by Ian McEwan; the middle third largely focuses on a soldier escaping the Germans through the French countryside before ending up at Dunkirk. Gives it more of a personal perspective.

  6. You said everything I was thinking. Dunkirk is an almost unknown event to young students and adults. The fact that no character became a focus, this horrific portrayal of bravery and courage became the story, the history. I would see it again.

  7. I've heard such good things about this one.

  8. Sorry I'm so late ready this, Mike. I'm definitely seeing Dunkirk, and I both look forward to the experience (it's already being hailed as one of the best war films ever made) and dread it -- all those young lives lost. I'm always moved by the reminder that civilians in hundreds of private boats aided in the rescue.